|
Panel comments:
"A kinetic, sensitive, and highly personal documentary. The film oscillates continuously between being sweet, abrasive, contemplative, critical, insightful, and unknowable – and in doing so formally enacts the ‘mixtape’ quality of its title. The film’s subject is presented as being full of contradictions and nuance, and the construction of the documentary creates a tactile, haptic embodiment of him – a viewing experience that feels tangible, which is at times deeply uncomfortable." |
Panel comments:
"An impressively ambitious film that offers a reframing of the Greek myth of Medea by positioning her brother Aspyrtus as being an integral character in the tragic narrative. Utilising tropes of Giallo horror in its use of colour, visceral gore, and mannered performances, along with elements of film noir the road movie, it offers an insightful reimagining of a well-established and oft-depicted myth that also explores fiction filmmaking’s potential as practice-research." |
|
Panel comments:
"A conceptually robust and inventive approach to practice-led research, examining the relationship between performance and reality, testing the boundaries of performance to evoke internal, often conflicting dichotomies of emotion, identity and ambition. The construct of audience as simultaneously viewer of the film and casting director in a concurrently invented/real scenario is one of a series of intriguing fluctuating reflexivities, provoking questions and revelations through the journey of the film’s looping narrative. The lighting, staging and composition all contribute to the investigation into performance techniques." |
Panel comments:
"The film provocatively counterpoints narratives of place, identity, belonging and tensions of voice to explore the UK’s borders in relation to experiences of and attitudes to migrancy.. The film is beautifully shot, and the meditative structure contrasts wonderfully with the oft aggressive and confrontational discourse which permeates the topic of immigration. An orchestrated approach to diegetic sound elevates the film’s soundscape, underscoring senses of control in both migrant experience and UK borderscapes It’s a fine example of politically engaged filmmaking, which challenges the dominant visual language of the form." |
|
Panel comments:
"A clear and well-grounded exploration of mental health and working-class masculinity in Looking for Eric. Its structured, explanatory approach makes the argument consistently easy to follow, with solid theoretical grounding throughout." |
Panel comments:
"Recognised for bringing the often unseen work of script supervision into thoughtful and engaging focus by weaving oral history with film clips. The multiscreen approach is well-chosen and effectively reflects the complexity of the role, earning its commendation for the feminist attentiveness of its approach — though clearer naming or on-screen referencing of the films discussed would have strengthened its scholarly framing further." |
Runner-upAda, or (Tijana Mamula)
Panel comments:
"Deeply personal yet intellectually expansive, Ada’s oblique narrative, fragmentation, and precise audiovisual composition allow inherited trauma to be felt rather than explained. By transforming intimate testimony into a critical cinematic method, the project demonstrates how the personal can generate new theoretical and formal pathways for contemporary narrative and practice-based film research." |
Honourable mentionRehearsing the Fall (Wanzhou Xiao)
Panel comments:
"This innovative and well crafted video essay rigorously explores how the depiction of falling in American films changed as a consequence of falling imagery related to 9/11 and, in so doing, the essay presents us with a new and original vision of how the video essay, as a practice form, can help us understand American society and culture in significantly new ways through the lens of practice led cinema analysis." |